Skip to content
  1. Home
  2. About

Review methodology

How we compare

NexKit separates editorial evidence, product data and commercial relationships. The goal is to show what is known, what is not known and why an option fits a trip without letting affiliate economics decide the answer.

Provider sources first

Policy facts come from provider terms, help centres or product pages. Each fact records where it came from, when it was checked and how far the source actually reaches.

Unknown stays unknown

If NexKit cannot verify a plan, price, rating, network, availability or policy detail, it is omitted or labelled unknown. Affiliate approval is never treated as product evidence.

User fit determines recommendations

Recommendation inputs are trip destination, trip length, data need, hotspot need, verified coverage and comparable product facts. Stable IDs break exact ties; no commercial metric is an input.

Commercial terms stay separate

Commission, CPS rate, payout, EPC, margin, conversion and revenue are excluded from editorial sorting and recommendation candidates. They cannot buy a higher position, label or conclusion.

Process

How a destination comparison is built

  1. Define the traveller decision the page must answer.
  2. Read first-party provider sources and record their date and scope.
  3. Present equivalent attributes side by side without filling evidence gaps.
  4. Keep provider-level affiliate CTAs outside the evidence table and label them.
  5. Recheck changing facts and correct stale or unsupported claims.

Commercial boundary

NexKit has an approved Saily affiliate relationship, but no verified Saily plan or price feed. A Saily button is therefore a provider-level checkout option, not a plan ranking, price claim, rating, sponsorship or endorsement. A click is not counted as a sale.

Read the affiliate disclosure